Skip to main content

Windows 10 Recommended Upgrade: Dirty Trick Or Helping Users


When Microsoft does something right it rarely makes the headlines. When it gets things wrong it always does. No wonder the company has such a poor reputation amongst the general populace. That said, knowing this to be the case you’d think the powers that be within Microsoft would do more to prevent some of the PR own goals that from the outside look completely avoidable.

Case in point, the Windows 10 upgrade for owners of Windows 7 and 8.x machines. Users who haven’t already upgraded have grown used to seeing the prompt telling them that an upgrade is available and we’ve all seen the videos of that pop-up disrupting news broadcasts and game streaming sessions.

Until now it was easy enough to be rid of the update by simply dismissing the pop-up, however in the last week Microsoft changed the behaviour of the dialog box so that dismissing the pop-up accepted the upgrade.

Unsurprisingly there has been uproar.

The fact that the most popular story on the BBC today was the story of this change and the way that it tricks users into upgrading to Windows 10 when they don’t want to be upgraded.

The dialogue box itself does present an option to prevent the upgrade, it just doesn’t make itself very obvious.

Microsoft’s response to the fuss is that the imminent cessation of its free Windows 10 upgrade offer means that many customers risk missing out. Sounds reasonable until you realise how much effort Microsoft has put into making sure that every user of an older version of Windows knows that there’s a free upgrade available.

If someone hasn’t upgraded to Windows 10 by now, chances are they just don’t want it. By being underhand (or giving the appearance of being underhand, which is just as bad) Microsoft is doing itself no good at all.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…