Skip to main content

Why I Couldn't Replace My MacBook Air With A New Mac


At approaching five years old my MacBook Air has given sterling, if problematic service. A battery that lost usable capacity faster than expected, plus a recurring and annoying screen corruption problem were the downsides to a solidly built, lightweight machine with a bright (if low-res) screen and great keyboard. Moving to a country where Apple doesn't have retail stores also highlighted how important they are to the overall Apple ownership experience.

Browsing Apple's current laptop catalogue it soon became apparent that whatever else I decided to invest my money in, Apple just didn't have anything that appealed. Its range has stagnated over the last few years, and whilst the MBA might be the inspiration for dozens of vaguely lookalike portables, the truth is that others have been doing a better job of design in attempting to compete.

The MBA and MBP haven't materially changed in the five years since I bought my last laptop. The MacBook doesn't appeal to me at all, in design, operation or value.

I could buy another MBA but realistically its some way behind the curve compared to what PC manufacturers have been doing since Microsoft's Surface Pro 3 prompted them to redo their design language.

Apple reported a second successive quarter of falling Mac Sales in March, and unlike when this happened in 2012/3, it isn't because users are choosing to go for iPads instead. Sales were off 12%, compared to a fall of 9% in the wider PC market.

With no new products to tempt upgraders, and no performance reasons to upgrade is it any wonder that Mac buyers have stayed at home for the last six months?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…