Skip to main content

Why Apple Isn’t Anything Like Facebook and Google

iphone launch jobs

Pop quiz: Who buys product from Facebook and Google? Your answer should be advertisers. Who buys Apple products? Overwhelmingly consumers.

Perhaps the biggest, most important point of difference between the three companies.

For Google and Facebook the big question isn’t where’s their next product coming from, it’s how they can ensure that they see the next market disruption before it arrives. It’s why Facebook repeatedly buys up and coming services that seem to have caught the zeitgeist; and Google is continually launching and researching new services and products. Because if someone comes along who’s doing a better job of attracting consumer eyeballs, advertisers will jump ship faster than you can say ‘so, whatever happened to Friends Reunited?’

Apple faces a very different challenge. Right now it has found itself a very profitable position at the head of the smartphone table. Its a position that Nokia and Blackberry occupied a decade ago. Until Apple came along with a product that was so radically better than what was on offer, and so difficult for their inertia driven organisations to compete with that it drove both to the brink of bankruptcy.

How about Microsoft. It wasn’t a major player in the phone market when the iPhone arrived. However it managed to completely miss the link between smartphones and its core business.

Ever since the iPhone arrived it has been obvious that it would become the most important device in a consumer or enterprise’s armoury. HTC even ran a phenomenally successful campaign based on the very idea: the phone that gets you. A culture of arrogance, blindness or perhaps the delusional belief that Microsoft would continue to carry all before it, meant that Microsoft failed to respond to the iPhone and also failed to realise what its success was going to do to the PC and Office software markets.

Microsoft was just so used to winning that it lacked the corporate will and direction to handle losing.

Apple is currently like a pre-2007 Microsoft. King of the Hill and riding high on profits and revenues that almost defy belief. And entirely at risk of being blind-sided by the next iPhone-sized big thing.

I don’t think that next big thing has arrived yet. It’s certainly not the smartwatch or the tablet. When it does turn up though, I fancy Apple’s response will be somewhat more robust than any of those major players managed nearly ten years ago.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…