Skip to main content

Where Would Microsoft Be Today If It Hadn’t Killed Windows Mobile 6.5?


In 2009, more than two years after the launch of the iPhone, Windows Mobile still held 9% of the smartphone market. Windows Mobile 6.5 had arrived that year to give a little visual refresh to Windows Mobile 6.1 which had developed into a pretty solid platform.

WM6.5 gave the platform a degree of finger friendliness that it had previously lacked – although that was as much to do with different form factors and the use of a stylus as anything else.

Windows Mobile was about choice back then – you could get touchscreen and non-touchscreen versions, candy-bar, flip, fold and tablet form factors; portrait, clamshell and slide out keyboard options and the ability to choose device sizes from the tiny to the ridiculously large.

On the software from there were a choice of Today screens – the traditional one from WM6.1, the finger friendly WM6.5 version or OEM’s own options.

Remind you of anything? Yes, Windows Mobile was the Android of its day, even down to the ropey availability of updates and the same cast of OEMs: HTC, Sony, HP, Samsung, Acer…

Which begs the question, what would have happened if Microsoft hadn’t thrown its mobile operating system and  users under the bus in order to pursue Windows Phone?

Its not that it was impossible to build a great phone based on the platform – the HTC HD2 and Touch Pro 2 more than demonstrated that. Each in its own way was the pinnacle of Windows Mobile design. Yes, even WM6.5 wasn’t very touch friendly, but fixes for those issues were easy and in many cases were already being provided by third party developers.

By the time Microsoft killed Windows Mobile it had mostly sorted stability, functionality and interface issues. It had a working app store and a good selection of mature software for the platform. It had OEMs producing devices that met the needs of enterprise and consumers, it had engaged developers and it had solid over the air and wired synchronisation functionality.

How much cash has Microsoft burned through to get to its current position? There’s the $8bn it spent and subsequently wrote off in acquiring Nokia, not to mention the alleged $3bn subsidy it paid to the Finnish company to switch it to Windows Phone and keep it there. Then there’s the development costs of three major platform refreshes.

If even a portion of that investment had been made against Windows Mobile 6.5 its entirely likely that Microsoft’s mobile platform would be in a position much closer to Android than riding the falling sales curve to oblivion.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…