Skip to main content

The Song Remains The Same: YouTube Draws Music Industry Ire

An open letter from music industry insider Irving Azoff appears on Re/code today and, in the world's least unexpected move of the day, attacks the technology industry for the way it interacts with the music industry, and in this case in his role as artist manager, artists.
Normally I have nothing but scorn for those in the music industry who fail to understand the changing nature of their own business and how the disruptive elements of new technology has slowed their gravy train. What's true for musicians is also true for taxi drivers and journalists.
I say normally, because unlike other letters from the industry, Azoff's is focused, exposes a specific problem and asks for a reasonable solution.
The target is YouTube and its inability to prevent music being illegally uploaded to the service. Azoff argues that YouTube manages to prevent its own premium content from leaking out from behind its paywall so why can't it prevent music from doing the same.
Its not a totally straightforward question to answer. For example there are elements of fair use to consider. However it does seem like YouTube may not be doing a great job of handling artists objections to their music appearing on the service.
On the other hand, many, if not all artists actively push their music videos onto YouTube because it is now the number one service for video consumption in any medium. An artist refusing to make their video available on the service is effectively signing their artistic suicide note. And after all videos were originally intended to be a marketing tool to sell more music rather than a product in themselves.
It isn't unreasonable for YouTube to provide artists with the same content management controls as the service uses for its own software. It's also reasonable for artists to demand the background data relating to plays, ads and revenue.
Google needs to step up and address these concerns to ensure that all parties involved (artists, consumers, advertisers and Google themselves) are getting a fair deal from YouTube's streaming service.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…