Skip to main content

The Android Dilemna: The Best Or The Most Up-to-date

Whilst Google was focusing very much on what's coming down the track in Android 7 - AKA Android N***** (Google isn't telling yet, but Nougat and Nutella seem the most likely choices) my Galaxy S6 was receiving its update to Marshmallow 6.0.1.
That's an awfully long time since the current release made its debut.
For me the GS6 was the best Android phone of 2015 and its successor, the Galaxy S7, is the best Android phone of 2016. However I'd not like to hazard a guess as to when either will get updated to Android 7.
Google's Nexus range is outclassed by Samsung's latest, whilst remaining a perfectly serviceable and usable selection of phones. The 6P tries to compete with Samsung in the premium space, whilst cheaper phones maintain the Nexus value offering.
Outclassed they may be, but slow to get updates they certainly aren't.
Its a dilemma that every person buying an Android phone today faces. Do I select a phone that isn't as good as I can get for the promise of future updates?
Neither iPhone users nor Windows 10 Mobile users face this problem. Apple has an exemplary record in managing to get versions out to customers iPhones en masse. Microsoft has done a pretty good job of doing the same once it pulled the trigger on the Windows 10 Mobile upgrade release. Even if it left some users behind who were expecting the upgrade.
Google needs to slow down its rate of change and decide how its going to manage updates in the future. The official launch of Android 7 would be a good opportunity to do that.
Without a resolution more and more users will inevitably bleed away to iOS and the guarantee of a phone that gets updates until its three or more years old.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…