Skip to main content

Peter Thiel, Gawker Media And The Balance Of Power


The future of Gawker Media hangs firmly in the balance this week, rocked first by its defeat at the hands of Hulk Hogan in the courts, secondly by the scale and target of the damages judgement and lastly by the news that Peter Thiel bankrolled Hogan’s court case.

The significance of the latter item can’t be over stated. Thiel was co-founder of PayPal, an early Facebook investor and currently fronts several financial funds. Thiel appears to have been using his considerable wealth to bankroll legal action against Gawker prior to the Hogan case.

The reason for Thiel’s pursuit of Gawker relates to a 2007 article that ‘outed’ him as gay. In fact in the article ‘Peter Thiel is totally gay, people’  author Owen Thomas (also gay apparently) appears to be publicising Thiel’s sexual preferences for political and personal advantage, rather than as an attempt to cause affront or report something that was in the public interest to know. Clearly an article that neither needed to be written nor published.

Given that it was, Thiel’s response has been to set out in search of revenge, although he is framing it as an attempt to deter similar articles from appearing. The end result will almost certainly be the death of Gawker, deprived of investment funds and on the end of a stream of well funded litigation that seeks to drive Gawker’s legal costs through the roof.

It’s hard not to take Thiel’s side here. Gawker played fast and loose with its position, not just in Thiel’s case or Hogan’s, but presumably in others too, playing the schoolyard bully in its search for clicks. I imagine that it put far too much store by the concept of free speech and not enough on public interest and as a result found it had woken a far bigger and more dangerous enemy than it was expecting.

If Thiel were to litigate Gawker out of existence it wouldn’t necessarily be a bad thing in itself, however the precedent it sets is dangerous. Legitimate investigation of powerful figures would die away as the media seeks to avoid confrontation with individuals or organisations with funding necessary to bring them to their knees.

A tough one to call, however it seems to me that the media needs to be protected from this kind of vindictive attack in the future. As a matter of balance, individuals should also be protected from this kind of intrusive reporting at the same time.

An individual should not have to be a billionaire to be able to defend their right to a private life.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.