Skip to main content

PayPal Kills Windows Phone App

paypal windows phone

More proof, as if it were needed, that Microsoft’s ambivalent messages about Windows Mobile are dragging the platform to a slow, drawn out and very painful death. This time it is PayPal, who will be killing its Windows Phone app, with no news of a Windows 10 replacement in the offing.

Paypal directs its customers to the mobile website, which is actually a pretty good alternative, however this isn’t how it will be seen by potential customers. To them it’s just more evidence that Windows Mobile isn’t a valid option when compared to Android or iOS.

You can hardly blame PayPal though, with Lumia sales collapsing and Windows share of the mobile market completely dependent on Lumia (conservatively 95% of all Windows Mobile sales) they would be putting development effort into an app that virtually nobody will ever use.

Windows Mobile has got itself into a vicious circle. There’s a well publicised app gap, which prevents customers from adopting the platform, which discourages developers from creating new apps or maintaining existing ones, which reinforces the app gap and round we go again.

Things were starting to look up for a while, sales were up and market share – particularly in Europe and Latin America – was beginning to start getting serious.

That’s when Satya Nadella dropped the bomb on Windows Phone and things have been downhill since there. Microsoft created a self fulfilling prophecy. Now it’s planning for a future where third party OEMs carry the weight of developing new Windows Mobile hardware. That’s going to be a difficult sell as customers melt away.

At a time when Windows 10 Mobile is close to as good as the Windows platform has ever been, I’m more pessimistic than ever about its short term future, never mind what will happen in the long term.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…