Skip to main content

Now Would Be A Good Time To Resurrect OQO


Talk about ahead of their time. The OQO pocket PC was a PC that actually fit in your pocket (well, for large values of pocket, anyway) and managed to deliver usable performance at a time when laptops were mostly still big and clunky and short on battery life, and the iPad had yet to revolutionise the tablet market. It was a beautifully designed device that owners took their hearts with the sort of loyalty that even Apple would struggle to match.

Those latter features are no doubt related to the genesis of the OQO being from the minds of former Apple employees. That Steve Jobs rejected the opportunity to make this an Apple product was probably an indication that it was doomed, but as a business it was at the very least a glorious failure, undone by the inability of the technology to keep pace with the desires of the engineers.

That is no longer the case. In fact based on what we have in regular use today in different devices it seems like the ideal time for OQO to rise from the ashes and deliver a new portable PC.

Some of OQO’s design features are now much better supported by technology. For example USB Type C offers all of the features OQO had to engineer into its proprietary dock cable and clunky connector. Intel now has CPUs in much smaller, power efficient packages which retain most of the power of their larger counterparts. The sliding keyboard was the best small keyboard I’ve ever used, together with the trackpoint device and active touchscreen  it could certainly stand a straight transplant into a new device.

A slimmer device with a slightly larger screen and the OQO form factor would actually deliver the true Windows 10 Continuum experience that Microsoft appears to want from Windows 10 Mobile.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…