Skip to main content

Manipulating Apple's Stock By Association

In recent weeks we've heard of big investors dumping Apple stock in numbers that most of us can't understand. Yes, Apple's results last quarter weren't up to their usual sky-rocketing returns, but a $50bn+ revenue and $10bn+ profit in a single quarter hardly smacks of a company that's on its way down.
So two questions: why sell the stock and why tell the world in such detail that you have?
The answer, I would suggest, is the reverse of the pump and dump scam that's been successfully deployed by so many decidedly dodgy characters.
Here's how I see it working. Investor A has a large position in Apple. By virtue of difficult trading positions its stock seems to have it its zenith - for now anyway. So how is a big money Capitalist going to ensure that their capital continues to grow? By dumping large amounts of stock onto the market, forcing the price down and then by telling everyone that they too should be getting out of Apple, forcing the price down further.
At some stage in the future, once the share price has fallen enough to allow for rapid growth (following the launch of the next iPhone for example) the stock can be re-bought in order to cash in on the upside.
Technically legal, but morally dubious behaviour.
Now let's take the flip side of the coin. One of Warren Buffett's investment managers at Berkshire Hathaway recently gobbled up $1bn of Apple shares on behalf of the company - at a share price of $108. However thanks to the dumping of shares by other investors the share price has collapsed and the buyer is down around $150m on the deal.
I suspect this is the reason why we're suddenly seeing 'Warren Buffett buys $1bn of Apple stock' headlines, as that investment manager tries to pump the shares by associating them with the big name investor and so recoup his losses. 
So, unless you have an investment interest in stocks and shares, you really should take all the headlines about stock price movements and most valuable companies with a large pinch of salt.
Because for every stock trading success story there's a sucker taking a  loss. Don't let it be you.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…