Skip to main content

Let’s End This US-Centric View That Windows Phone Wasn’t Growing


Microsoft struggled to make headway in the US smartphone market and that seems to have become the over-riding world view of Windows Phone. I’m even inclined to believe that Microsoft itself took the decision to back away from its mobile division because US sales weren’t growing fast enough.

However its crazy to dismiss the success that Nokia achieved in moving Windows Phone forward, even if it was success bought at the cheaper end of the market.

So whilst the US only briefly saw 6% of the market go to Microsoft, in the UK it peaked at 12%, in Germany 11%, France 13% and in Italy at 17%. It isn’t just Europe either. At its peak Windows Phone held 12% of the Russia market, 9% in Brazil, 13% in Argentina and Mexico.

It’s notable that all of those markets are the ones where Nokia was traditionally strong. Sales were undoubtedly strongest at the lower end of the market – the success of the Lumia 520 proves that – however faced with the prospect of upselling those users to more expensive phones Microsoft didn’t have the industry knowledge to follow through.

We’ll never know whether Microsoft would have persevered with the slow but steady growth of its mobile division if Steve Ballmer had remained as CEO. We’ll also never know whether Nokia could have managed to grow its smartphone business if it had remained independent (and continued to receive a subsidy from Microsoft). Assuming it didn’t drop Windows Phone for Android of course.

Unfortunately all we’re really doing now is picking over the carcass of Windows Phone. Technically its dead, with Windows 10 Mobile having replaced it. Windows 10 Mobile is going to struggle to gain any traction now, as has been discussed at length before.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…