Skip to main content

If No New Lumias Then What?


Windows 10 Mobile might well be a great operating system – and if Microsoft continues to deliver its regular updates it promises to keep getting better and better, but if no one is buying is it really worth all the effort?

For Microsoft the answer has to be yes. Its Universal App strategy needs Windows Mobile. For all its plans to run Windows apps on Xbox and Hololens the crossover is minimal and even forced. Without Windows Mobile it makes little sense.

Windows Mobile does not equal Lumia though. For all the (slow and hard won) momentum Microsoft has built around the platform – which in recent years has meant Lumia – Microsoft, like Nokia before it, never really seemed to get a grasp of what it needed to do from a hardware perspective to make a true competitor to the iPhone and Galaxy S.

Even having stewardship of both hardware and software didn’t really bring any major leaps forward. The Lumia 930 was developed under Nokia’s stewardship and shipped in early 2014. Take a look at the replacement Lumia 950 – developed by Microsoft – and see if there are eighteen months of progress there.

For Microsoft killing the Lumia works in one of two ways, if you accept that it needs Windows Mobile to make any sense of its current strategies.

Firstly, it may kill Lumia and replace it with a new brand – the almost mythical Surface Phone. How does this help? Surface is now seen as a premium brand and by building a premium phone Microsoft has a product which may compete with the top end iOS and Android handsets. The problem is that if Microsoft does this it kills the only really profitable part of the smartphone market for its partners. Premium Windows Mobile sales (such as they are) will continue to go to Microsoft and OEM partners will disappear just as they did after the Nokia partnership was announced.

The second choice is for Microsoft to stop making smartphones completely. Instead creating a Nexus-like relationship with partners similar to what it has recently done with HP for laptops. Helping OEMs to build Windows Phones which compete with each other and other platforms, rather than being overwhelmed by the mother ship would seem like good business sense.

This second option might work, if Microsoft can persuade partners to build a solid range of handsets. If it can get those Android OEMs suffering in the current market to try something new it may be able to grow the platform again. Will there be the interest from partners? Even if there is, will there be consumer interest in a platform that is seen to have multiple issues? Certainly it seems like enterprise has moved on and the iPhone is going to win in that market.

With the world moving to mobile as the primary computing resource you have to question a strategy that places all your eggs in your competition’s basket, don’t you?


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…