Skip to main content

Google Duo Promises To Bring The Pain To Skype


 
When 3G arrived all those years ago one of the features that carriers thought would drive adoption was video calling. Unfortunately they badly missed the market with their calling costs and understanding of the desire to use the feature.
 
Since then Skype has taken ownership of the home to home video calling market and FaceTime has become the de facto standard for mobile video calls. You know that's the case because you'll hear non-technical people using them as verbs. Ex-pats calling home don't ring, they Skype. Apple customers take every opportunity to FaceTime each other.
 
And Google...
 
Well today's IO conference brought the announcement of Duo, a video calling app that's deeply integrated into Android and gives the platform a video service that Hangouts could never be.
 
So with FaceTime locked to iOS users and Skype and Duo being cross platform, video calling is gradually being fragmented into services where you'll need to know what sort of device your friends, family or colleagues have before you attempt to call them.
 
In theory Skype, as the only service that is truly cross platform with desktop and mobile apps for everyone, should be in a strong position to compete here. But it won't. Users will choose their platform default and almost certainly choose Duo for Android to iOS calls - if they bother with them at all. Its strength on the desktop will keep Skype valid for a little while longer, but as the desktop continues to lose importance in users lives have no doubt that it will fall under the weight of Apple and Google's better mobile integration.
 
Of course if Microsoft had a stronger mobile platform it would have a beach head to launch a Skype offensive from, offering its 'every device' capability as a justification for installation on iPhones and Androids alike. With Windows Mobile withering away that opportunity is lost. How many people even know of the existence of a Windows Mobile phone, never mind know someone who uses one.
 
Microsoft's future as a services company rather hinges on how long it takes Google and Apple to wipe its footprint off their devices and by extension make them irrelevant. This is the reason why Microsoft needed to make Windows Mobile work. That it failed to do so is going to be a source of much pain for the company in the not too distant future.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.