Skip to main content

Does The Badge On The Device Determine Your Purchasing Decision?

Do you have a go-to brand that is your default choice when buying a new device? It's a relatively common phenomenon. People with iPhones are more likely to own iPads and eventually to migrate to a Mac. Galaxy phone owners are more likely to have Samsung tablets and Sony owners a whole host of Sony equipment.
When it comes time to replace our devices loyalty is pretty high too. Recent surveys have shown that around 80% of buyers will stick with the brand they already have.
As buying cycles get longer though and each purchase ties you into a longer relationship, buyers may be doing themselves a disservice by failing to look at alternative options when buying - even if only to validate the suitability of the device selected.
For me that was driven home by my decision to replace my laptop. As I've posted before, Apple's range offered nothing new over my existing MacBook Air. My other default purchase has been from Microsoft, having bought both Surface Pro and Surface 3 models previously. As a result the Surface Book looked like an easy choice.
Except that much as I liked the Surface Book design, objectively it gave me some concerns. For a device with a likely usable life of five or more years the unproven fulcrum hinge design and screen release mechanism didn't fill me full of confidence. Great screen, great looks and flexibility all score well, but a risky choice, even setting aside the reliability problems that have dogged the Surface Book since launch.
So having gone into the purchasing process expecting to go with another Apple or Microsoft device I'd ruled both out before even really getting going. Once I started looking further afield it became clear that better devices existed than anything either offered, and I needed to set aside my brand preferences to get the right one for me.
It's something worth bearing in mind when you're next in the market.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…