Skip to main content

Does Anyone Still Actually Click A Trackpad?

Whilst acquainting myself with the updated, 2016 MacBook I found myself playing around with its Force Touch feature - which I have to say still leaves me completely cold - and its haptic feedback trackpad, another feature that I just don't understand.
I'm not sure at what point I stopped using physical buttons on a trackpad. Certainly the Dell Latitude which I used at the end of the last century supported 'tap clicks' on its Synaptics trackpad. I strongly suspect that there were machines before that one too. However for the sake of certainty I can say that I haven't clicked a physical trackpad button (or the trackpad itself once discrete buttons disappeared) in more than a decade and a half.
The exceptions are of course during the Apple setup process, when you are forced to click the trackpad to select, at least until you can get far enough through the setup to enable tapping.
Its such a pointless exercise and such an outdated action. A 'tap click' is smoother, quieter and requires much less effort on the part of the hand doing the clicking.
Which brings me back to the MacBook. Apple made a lot of noise about the trackpad feeling like it moved when it didn't when it launched the original last year. Its not been a topic of conversation this year but its still there. And it's still completely pointless.
A two fingered tap is an inherent part of the OS X user experience, so why would Apple be shunting people towards a physical click, rather than a single tap? Especially when it is having to go to some effort to simulate the whole thing anyway.
So, if you are the person who still clicks your trackpad, let me encourage you to 'tap click' instead. Maybe once we're all doing it we can ignore pointless haptic clicks and pointless hype?


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…