Skip to main content

Apple Music: Can Apple Fix Its First Mistake In Decades

Apple played such a large part in bringing about the changes that have made music retailing what it is today that it becomes almost impossible to comprehend the scale of its miss on streaming music. Having been late to the party Apple went for a quick fix by paying through the nose for Beats and its existing music streaming service. In the transition it managed to achieve two almost unthinkable things - it delivered a truly bad product and it alienated some of its biggest fans.

Apple Music is something of a train wreck.

That's overstating the case of course - with 13 million subscribers Apple has the second biggest on-demand music streaming service in the world. It's hardly something that you'd describe as a failure by any other company's measure.

For Apple though it has been a worrying sign of fallibility that draws some interesting parallels.

Rewind just a few years and Apple basically owned the music business. Sales of music through iTunes were the biggest and fastest growing methods of consuming music. Steve Jobs had managed to force the music industry to bend to his will - first in setting a fixed price for music and second by ensuring that tracks were available individually and not forced on the consumer as an album purchase.

Like Microsoft with the internet two decades ago, Apple completely missed the rise of the streaming music business. As Spotify grew its subscriber numbers Apple failed to spot the coming juggernaut that was coming to derail its gravy train. Even Microsoft reacted more swiftly and Apple was eventually the last big name to get into the game.

When it did so it managed to so badly manage the Apple Music app, service and desktop integration, that users were dissuaded from signing up in their millions. The free trial to subscription conversion rate is low - and slowing apparently - and the bad blood that came from destroying customer's carefully curated music collections still colours Apple Music today.

So the news that Apple is aiming for a do-over of the software and service is critical. Nothing the company has done has been this badly received since the Apple Newton. Putting it right - and demonstrating that it can be trusted to manage customers music and streaming - would indicate that all is still right in the Apple world.

With an estimated one billion iOS users out there - a captive audience for Apple - it seems barely believable that the service has only been able to convert such a small cohort of users. It seems highly unlikely to me that when Tim Cook dropped $3bn on Beats he would be expecting to have seen such a minimal return from the streaming service.

With streaming now generating more income than downloads, its a situation that Apple needs to turn around. Quickly.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.