Skip to main content

Apple Is Planning For A Music Streaming Only Future

You've probably seen reports about how Apple is making plans for the end of iTunes as a music store. Depending on who you believe Apple has either set a date of two years in the future, sometime in the future or never in relation to the shuttering of the iTunes Music Store.
That really shouldn't be a surprise. Streaming has overtaken purchasing as the largest revenue generator for the music business as a whole, so moving its focus to Apple Music and away from the Music Store just seems like a natural response to this change.
As to shuttering the Music Store, I'm doubtful whether it is something Apple will do in the immediate future, sales of music may well be decreasing but there's a way to go before it becomes economically prudent to shut it down.
Don't be fooled though, that day is coming.
If Apple has been alive to the growth of music streaming services earlier than it was we would almost certainly have been talking about a shut down already. Apple's launch of Apple Music has garnered it 13 million users. These users haven't come from existing services either. In fact market leader Spotify has seen a faster uptake of its service since Apple Music launched than before it.
Apple's arrival has legitimised streaming services, particularly amongst the Apple fans who might have shied away from anything without Apple branding. If Apple had been on the ball and had its service ready to go even only twelve months earlier the explosive growth of streaming consumers may just have put us into a position where we really would be talking about the death of music sales.
There are some consumers who won't like it and rather more artists who will also object, but like vinyl and the CD before it, I suspect the MP3 download is a dead dodo walking.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…