Skip to main content

Apple - Didi Chuxing Tie-up More Than Just Ride Hailing

Apple has invested $1bn in Chinese ride hailing service Didi Chuxing, the Uber rival that is destroying its better known opponent in the surprisingly buoyant Chinese market. The company serves 11 million rides a day.
For Apple there are good reasons to get into bed with a ride sharing company, with many surmising that its a response to the tie up between GM and Lyft and the days when taxis are self driving cars that arrive at your day unmanned. With rumours of an Apple Car in development - an electric, self driving one no less - this looks like a wise move.
Of course that particular value wouldn't be realised until Apple was ready to ship its car and that's likely to be some time in the future.
So I'm more inclined to see Apple's investment delivering benefits in different areas. Firstly there's the reason espoused by Tim Cook, the opportunity to learn the Chinese market and take a slice of the company's healthy bottom line in the process.
That seems like the very smallest slice of this particular pie.
Much more likely that Didi Chuxing is providing Apple a shortcut straight into the ride hailing business, in the same way that Beats Music provided the shortcut into music streaming. With Apple playing catch-up in the last billion dollar industry I'd say this tie up is designed to make sure it doesn't miss out on the next.
Apple Car could just as well be about competing with Uber in the areas of the US that have embraced the upstart service. With Apple branding Uber would face serious competition. Yes an Apple Car might actually arrive some time after the launch of Apple Car, but the service is the key here.
At the last end of quarter earnings call Tim Cook intimated that Apple will be focusing more of its energies on building up the services side of its business.
This seems to me to be the perfect embodiment of that plan.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…