Skip to main content

Oh Canada! Microsoft Offering Two For One On Lumia 950s

Microsoft Canada seems to have come up with an innovative way of improving its sales numbers for next quarter: everyone you buy a phone they give you another free. Excellent tactic tainted only by the stink of desperation that emanates from the offer.

It's a bad move in so many ways.

Firstly, it's not actually going to coax any more sales out of the woodwork -  buyers who would otherwise have ignored the 950 XL aren't going to stop doing so because of the prospect of getting a free 950. Those already planning to buy one will likely shift the free handset the don't want or need on ebay, dropping the second hand values of those handsets out there and also limiting new sales by throwing a lot of unopened, warranted devices into the second hand market.

And of course customers in other regions are going to halt that 950 purchase have they were planning as they wait for the offer to go global.

So far from having a positive effect (except perhaps on Microsoft Canada's stock inventory) there's no real benefit for Windows Mobile.

There were other ways in which Microsoft could have made this deal more attractive. A years subscription to Office 365, a year's subscription to Groove Music and a free Continuum dock would have cost less whilst offering a consumer a pretty compelling bundle.

Of course Microsoft couldn't do that as it seems intent on keeping Groove a completely secret service, and bundling it would have let customers know that it existed.

There's widespread acknowledgement that the Lumia 950 and XL don't feel like the premium handsets their price tags suggests. Microsoft seems to have significantly overshot in its attempts to correct that mistake.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…