Skip to main content

Oasis: A Kindle For The 0.1%

Like many of you I haven't read a physical book in years. In fact it's closer to a decade and a half. eBooks are just so convenient, accessible and portable that they override any argument about the tactile experience of owning a processed tree.

I tend to use two devices for reading, my phone and my tablet. As eBook software does a good job of syncing page position across devices it means that I can switch between the two at will. However when I'm travelling I see more and more people using Kindles. There's a good reason for this - screens that are far and away the easiest on the eye when reading and battery life which is measured in days or weeks, not hours.

Yesterday Amazon extended the Kindle range upward, with the new Oasis, which packs an upgraded screen, a thinner and lighter body; and a clever case design. All adding up to a premium experience. It is quite clearly a top of the range device designed to offer customers who want the best reading experience, the best reading experience.

And it's priced to reflect that fact.

Why the internet at large is so surprised at this last fact is beyond me. Some people want the premium experience and are prepared to pay for it. Amazon just gave them an option. It isn't designed to sell against $80 Kindles, instead it gives the company a spread of devices - which is really the whole point of selling a range of devices.

This may only be 5% better then other Kindles in the range, and the Oasis may make up less than 1% of Kindle sales, but in many ways its the most impressive part of Amazon's portfolio. Proof that the company can do more than just cheap box shifting, proof that it can make a device that compares favourably to physical books for the whole reading experience. 

Sometimes it's about more than just the numbers.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…