Skip to main content

Microsoft’s Bet On Bots Loses Without A Strong Mobile Platform


At Build 16 Microsoft presented a interesting view of a future where Bots replace Apps. Satya Nadella offered conversation as a platform – replacing the need to scout through dozens of apps with a natural conversation.

The concept of conversation bots is a good one. Make a request to a single controlling application on your phone and have it connect you to bots that can field your request. For example, Microsoft demonstrated searching for a hotel and then being connected to the hotels bot to book a room.

The only problem for Microsoft is that by allowing its mobile platform to wither it loses out on this potentially lucrative interaction.

Can you imagine Apple users turning to anything but Siri to manage this conversation, Google users choosing to abandon Google Now? It isn’t going to happen. Microsoft has pushed Cortana onto those platforms, yet by its very nature as an add-on app it is less well integrated into the platform.

Cortana, on the other hand, has already demonstrated the ability to interact with other applications and tools on Windows Phone / Windows 10.

The natural place for these conversation based bots is mobile and without a strong platform of its own Microsoft is going to find that bot developers go the same way as app developers – straight to Apple and then Google. Why develop for Windows 10 / Cortana / Skype?

Mobile is absolutely the most important platform now and in the future. Not being able to entice customers means a lack of interest from developers means a future as just another software company for Microsoft.

Satya Nadella’s abandonment of Steve Ballmer’s Devices and Service Strategy might have been popular for some, but the potential long-term damage to Microsoft’s business is great.

Don’t believe me then take a look at how abandoning hardware platforms is working out for IBM.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…