Skip to main content

IDC Sees 0.2% Growth In Smartphone Shipments


IDC has reported growth of just 0.2% in global smartphone shipments in the first calendar quarter of 2016, with a significant fall in the rate of growth in China identified as the driver behind the slowdown.

Samsung comfortably managed to retain its position at the top of the tree, maintaining its year on year volume. As previously discussed Apple saw a massive contraction in volume, though it retained second place in the market. However the growth of Huawei at number three continues at a pace, with volume up by nearly 60% year on year.

It’s not inconceivable that Huawei may sneak past Apple into second place in the market ahead of the launch of the iPhone 7 – which will undoubtedly fix Apple’s sales problems.

Oppo and vivo are now the fourth and fifth placed manufacturers, both growing massively – IDC suggests that this is a result of the change in the buying patterns of the Chinese market, with average selling price rising from $207 in 2013 to $257 last year.

None of which explains why Apple sales are so far off. The Chinese market has continued to grow – and we’re told that Apple is strong in China. The richening of the average sales price should benefit Apple. So either Apple has seen a massive slowdown outside of China, whilst still performing well in China, or it has failed to maintain its momentum in the region.

With Q1 containing the Chinese New Year sales bump, it will be interesting to see what happens to the market in Q2 – will there be a contraction of the market as a whole, mirroring the fall in Apple’s sales at one month delay or will it hold steady, with the fall in Apple’s sales being a blip, perhaps caused by delays ahead of the iPhone SE launch and supply problems once it became available.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…