Skip to main content

HTC 10: Flagship Evolution, But Who Will It Appeal To?

HTC announced the latest version of their flagship phone today, replacing the One M9 with the evolutionary HTC 10. It looks to be a solid phone, with premium build, great screen and a handful of borderline innovative features that attempt to set it apart from the Android crowd.

The new camera and laser autofocus system allegedly put the 10 on a par with the Samsung S7 / Edge, which currently ranks as the best smartphone camera available. Paired with a selfie camera packing OIS and some fancy 24-bit sound hardware the 10 manages to differentiate itself in some areas.

However, the problem for HTC remains: how can it compete against the Samsung steamroller? The weight of the Samsung marketing steamroller is going to prevent the 10 getting much of a foothold.

It has tried to make its new phone more like a Nexus, with a redrawn Sense UI and toned down customisations, but the value proposition for the Nexus - instant updates - will be denied it all the same. 

HTC faces the same problem as Sony. There's a limited market for premium Android phones. And Samsung mostly has it strung up. And if you aren't buying a Samsung, Huawei is making great strides in turning into its number one challenger. The P9's dual camera setup looks like it has a lot more retail presence than the new HTC camera setup. Ironic given HTC's previous efforts with dual camera setups.

It's difficult to see where HTC increases its customer base with this phone.

Which makes the way the HTC 10 performs almost immaterial. Its market is primarily those Samsung and Apple customers prepared to try something different. If it can persuade more of those to go for the 10 than it loses M8 and M9 customers to everyone else, it will have a minor success on its hands. And if it can do that without discounting the phones too heavily it may even turn a small profit on the deal.

Right now that seems like the best it can hope for.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…