Skip to main content

Did The Microsoft Surface Outsell The iPad Pro Last Quarter?

A number of Apple fan sites and bloggers made much of the news that the all new iPad Pro had outsold Microsoft’s Surface range last quarter, ignoring the very different aims of the two products.

The Surface was a product which Microsoft designed to give direction and leadership to PC OEMs. It wasn’t seeking to own the market, rather to create a direction which showcased Windows at its best and gave PC builders something to ‘riff’ on when putting together their own products.

So although the iPad Pro outsold the Surface it was swamped by Windows two-in-one sales as a whole.

However the recent financial reports would seem to suggest that the Microsoft’s Surface probably outsold the iPad Pro last quarter despite not intending to.

Apple’s sales numbers and revenue figures suggest that the mix of iPads sold in its financial Q2 was not much different to that in Q1. Based on the numbers that Apple provided that equates to about 1.4m iPad Pros shipped.

Microsoft doesn’t give us any information on device shipments for Surfaces, but based on revenue figures last quarter and this quarter, and accounting for some run out pricing offers on the Surface Pro 3, it looks like Microsoft may have shipped slightly more than 1.4m Surfaces over the same period.

Whether the mark was achieved this quarter or happens some time in the future, Apple’s refusal to deliver a true hybrid still looks incredibly short-sighted. iPad sales as a whole dropped by 16% - faster than IDC estimate of a 14% fall for the market as a whole, whilst Microsoft saw Surface sales jump 61% year on year.

Like its lengthy delay in producing a large screen phone Apple’s just doesn’t seem to be able to skate to where the puck’s going to be at the moment.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…