Skip to main content

Yahoo Standing On The Edge Of The Abyss


Shares in Yahoo jumped yesterday on news that the board were considering options for disposing of its core internet business and reforming the company as a custodian of its share of Alibaba.

This makes no sense.

I don't mean the idea of disposing of the core internet business. That has been an obvious step for most of the last decade. Turning down Microsoft's 2008 bid for the business was probably the worst decision in the company's history.

Reforming around Alibaba makes some sense, as its stake is currently valued at $30bn. Whether there's actually much business to do as a result is another matter.

The whole question will swing on how much Yahoo is able to lay off its assets for. Since Marissa Meyer took over the reins the company has been profligate in its spending and acquisition strategy.

Is there an expectation that it can sell of the whole unbalanced mess which would form the rump of the non-Alibaba business for anything like the cost of its recent acquisitions? I certainly don't believe so.

The company is currently valued at around $31bn. Almost exactly $1bn more than the value of its Alibaba stake. Meaning the rest of the business is currently valued at less than it paid for Tumblr just two years ago.

Nice work. Not.

So what doesn't make sense? The idea that the stock's value would jump on the prospect of a sale, that's what. Unless Apple decides it wants to turn the whole mess around I can't see anyone digging in their pockets for the business, either as a whole or hived off into smaller more digestible chunks.

Time to put the Yahoo we once know on death watch? I would say so. Seven years ago I wrote that if Yahoo failed to reach agreement with Microsoft it would be the end of the company. The fulfilment of that prophecy is looking ever more imminent.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…