Skip to main content

Samsung Took The Lead On Innovation In 2015

Consumer technology went through a process of renewal and refinement through 2015. We saw the arrival of better tablet, hybrids, smartphones and wearables, but who moved the game forward the most?
In recent years the expectation has always been that it would be Apple that led the charge in both innovation and design. This year that was far from the case. It's biggest announcements turned out to be derivative (Apple Music, Watch and iPad Pro) and what innovation Apple brought to the table was mostly under the surface. The new mechanism that allowed for a thinner keyboard on the MacBook and pressure sensitive screens and trackpads. Nice to have but nothing to get excited about.
There was little to excite in Apple's software updates either, OS X and iOS both saw gradual improvements, but these were catch up features to narrow the gap to the competition.
Google had a quiet year too. There was nothing about its Nexus devices or Chromebooks that shouted game changer, and it ended the year with the launch of the disappointing Pixel C.
For Microsoft 2015 was about Windows 10. In terms of take up and delivery it was a solid product that took the best of Windows 7 and Windows 8. The Surface Pro, Surface and Surface Book proved that Microsoft could compete with Apple in hardware and software. For me the Surface 3 was the product of the year. However all of its best products relied heavily on what had gone before and there was nothing truly innovative about what it delivered. In some areas (mobile especially) Microsoft retrenched.
Samsung started the year in the doldrums, but by year end had turned things around. The Galaxy S6 Edge was the first sign that design was a feature of the new Samsung. Its screen was a real step forward. Curved on both edges and with an insanely high resolution, this remains the best screen that you can get on any mobile device. Period.
This was followed by the Gear S2. Yet another Samsung smartwatch? Anything but. Samsung rethought its wearable strategy and with the S2 showed that it could outdo Apple. The Gear S2 packs a beautiful round screen and, more importantly, the best UI on any smartwatch. The rotating bezel is a work of genius and the first time that you use it you wonder why every smartwatch doesn't work this way. A clear sign of innovative thinking.
Finally the Gear VR. Consumer VR at an insanely affordable price. No-one who has used it has been anything but stunned. Oculus and Samsung have delivered a truly immersive experience, something that puts me in mind of Red Dwarf's Better Than Life episodes. It is innovation in spades, concept, execution, delivery and pricing.
For me it was the most innovative product of the year, delivered by the most innovative company of the year.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…