Skip to main content

Phones That We Kept For Years

A Motorola MicroTAC like this was my phone for more than three years in the 90s.
I really can't remember a great deal about the time before the arrival of smartphones, but what I do remember is a total lack of urgency to constantly upgrade from one release to the next.

In the twelve years between getting my first cell phone in 1993 and getting my first true smartphone in 2005 I had fewer phones than I've had in the last eighteen months.

That list stretches just eight phones long. Five regular cell phones and three proto-smartphones  (Nokia Communicator, Sony-Ericsson R380 and P800).

To count my last eight smartphone purchases I need only travel back to June of last year.

It isn't just me (although I admit I'm probably an extreme case). Apple, retailers and networks all now have schemes that allow you to replace your phone every year. It's clearly something that people want to do.

Is it the frenzied pace of development which adds features and reduces the size of our phones that drives us?

Between the Sony Xperia Z1 that I bought in January 2014 and the Z5 that would replace it this coming January there have been three and a half revisions of the phone, Adding a brighter screen, slightly upgraded camera and fingerprint sensor. Nothing critical there.

What has changed is the software. Google has been through two major Android updates. The Z1 hasn't.

On the iOS side of the fence there have been bigger hardware changes, yet the draw to upgrade remains the same even though a two year old iPhone 5S can happily run iOS9.

The truth is that the companies selling these phones have got better at getting us to be conspicuous consumers. Advertising, competition, customer loyalty that borders on sports fan obsession.

Most two-year old smartphones would deliver almost as good a smartphone experience as their current counterparts, yet the draw of the new and shiny has become so great that we constantly chase the latest trinkets.

There's a purpose behind this demand though. We run our lives through our phones. Banking, communication, education, navigation, entertainment, shopping. They are all just part of the smart phone experience. Is it any wonder that we want our most important tool to be the best and most up to date we can get?

Our counterparts from twenty years ago would be appalled but the leisurely replacement cycles of days gone by aren't tenable today. Just as a life that revolved around the small glowing screens would have been inconceivable to them.

The pace of change is both relentless and accelerating.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.