Skip to main content

Tim Cook Furiously Backpedalling On 'iPad Pro Only' Endorsement

 
 
As I've mentioned before, Apple generally follows up the release of a new product by wheeling out senior executives to big up the new device and belittle the competition. With the iPad Pro it seems like it may have gone a little crazy and dismissed a whole class of its own products unintentionally.
 
The origin of this story was an interview in which Tim Cook said that he only travels with his iPad Pro and iPhone and couldn't understand why anyone would ever buy a PC again.
 
I've already disputed these comments, so won't question their validity again. However, someone at Apple seems to have belatedly realised that Apple itself is heavily invested in the PC business and as a result Cook's comments could be seen as an instruction to the Mac faithful to avoid its products.
 
Probably not the result Apple were looking for.
 
So a subsequent interview has Cook furiously backpedalling on his statements and trying to justify the existence of Macs by saying that he doesn't consider them to be PCs.
 
Really?
 
Apple's intent was clearly to further damage PC manufacturers by dissing their products. Given that Apple is one of the largest PC manufacturers it clearly didn't see the downside of that argument early enough.
 
To claim that Macs are not PCs is ridiculous and only serves to highlight how little honesty and conviction comes out of Apple right now.
 
If you honestly believe that the iPad Pro is the end for PCs come out and say it and be proud of it. Be the Apple that wasn't afraid to cannibalise products by releasing better products in a different category.
 
Saying things purely because you're desperate to breathe life into a failing product line by launching a derivative, me-too product when slamming the competition is the only thing you've got? That's not the Apple we deserve.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…