Skip to main content

The Surface Is Still A Better Tablet Than The iPad Pro Is A PC

The iPad Pro is Apple's big hope for its tablet range. With consecutive quarters of falling sales and more than a year of falling market share Apple's recent performance in the Post-PC era (as defined by Apple) has been poor.

The iPad Pro is a different proposition for iPad buyers: a tablet replacement for their MacBook or desktop, an idea very clearly cribbed from Microsoft.

The iPad may well be the best tablet ever made. And for some users it may well be capable of filling every computing need they have. However there are just too many compromises required by iOS for that to be entirely true, for all but the lightest users.

For example, Safari on iOS is not a true desktop class browser, which means that there are many sites out there that don't render properly. I've come across two examples in the last couple of days testing. Yes, it's true that no website should have problems on an iPad in this day and age, but the truth is that some do.
Which is one of the reasons why  I firmly believe that the Surface remains a far better choice for someone looking for a single device them the iPad Pro. It does true desktop service, delivering the full laptop experience. And whilst it may not have as wide a choice of tablet apps as the iPad, it manages to turn every piece of Windows software into a tablet app by virtue of its interface and Windows 10.

There are people who will tell you that the Surface is not a good tablet. They are obviously people who have had no experience of using one for any length of time.

So, if you're looking for a companion device for your laptop or desktop the iPad Pro is a good choice if you can like its extra size and weight. If you're looking for a single device to deliver all of your computing requirements a Surface is still a better choice.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…