Skip to main content

IPad Pro, Day Three: Wrapup

 
Three days wouldn't normally be long enough to give a valid verdict on a new product. However with the iPad Pro I think it's possible to get a real flavour of what it is and what it isn't.
 
One of the things it isn't is a finished product. Rather than tweak iOS for the new screen size and ways of working, Apple pretty much left them as they were. Things like the icon spacing look ridiculous, as do apps that pull up the standard keyboard.
 
Even the Apple logo is mounted in portrait orientation – for a device that is not particularly comfortable to use that way around. This is a landscape device.
 
It's too thin as well.
 
Given the surface area of the Pro I'd say making it super thin shouldn't have been a priority. With just a little more girth it should have been possible to build an iPad with a legendary battery life. Instead the designer's need to slim things down over-rode the user demands for extended battery life.
 
Not that battery life is anything short of excellent. It just could be longer. Charging is slow. Which doesn't help.
 
As the iPad Pro departs for its new owner what will I miss? In truth very little. There were too many times when iOS frustrated me. When it was doing iPad things I found myself wishing I was using my iPad Air 2, and when I was doing desktop things I was desperate for my Surface 3.
 
It's somewhat ironic that the iPad Pro would be infinitely better if Apple had built it with a view to competing with the Surface Book. Tim Cook slated that device recently.
 
It would be nice to have seen it running OS X, as my gut reaction told me immediately after launch, however I think if Apple were to add mouse pointer support to iOS it would make the iPad Pro a much better device.
 
I'm told that iOS supports limited keyboard shortcuts for interacting with the Pro. Unfortunately that only extends to some basic operations.
 
If I were allowed only one device (and I was determined to use Apple) I think I'd probably choose the MacBook over the iPad Pro. If I were allowed two devices I would choose the MacBook and iPad Air 2 over the iPad Pro as well.
 
If I wasn't committed to buying Apple there is no question that my money would go on a Surface Pro 4.
 
iPad sales figures are bound to take a leap this quarter. However, retail locations here in NZ have stock of the Pro - we have no Apple Stores here, so this is just your average retailer. If that is replicated around the globe that means Apple supply chain has either been extremely successful or demand for a big iPad was over-estimated somewhat.
 
So in summary, more than a big iPad, less than a game changer. Apple has re-invented the iPad, which offers a good value proposition for users who fit the iPad Pro template.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.