Skip to main content

EE Considers Ad-Blocking On Mobiles

Project Fi may be a bigger part of Google's future than currently appears.
Today is promising to be a day about ad-blocking. Hot on the heels of the news that Yahoo is preventing some users from accessing email services if they have ad-blockers enabled, comes a report in the Daily Telegraph, which suggests that EE, currently the UK's largest mobile network, will offer customers the option to block ads at a network level.

This doesn't promise to end well.

Presumably web site publishers have several lines of recourse against EE if it were to enable this offering across its network. No doubt OFCOM would get involved, and there are some very concerning precedents for net neutrality. Presumably allowing this selective control of what the customer sees (almost certainly hand in hand with an financially attractive offer to allow certain advertisers content through) requires only logical one step to jump from blocking adverts to blocking websites that the network finds unacceptable.

Ultimately large content networks could block any user arriving from an EE IP address from ever seeing their content. Which would make all those data caps meaningless as the web bifurcates into fiefdoms of interest looking to extract funding from the consumer, publisher and network in different ways.

iPhone users would see a different internet to EE users who see a different internet to PC users and so on.

I guess there's a very good reason why Google has taken the first steps to building its own mobile service. It can guarantee delivery of its content (and by this I mean adverts) without any third-party coming between it and the customer.

Project Fi might be in its infancy, but if the company feels that its revenue streams are at threat from mobile network action like this it's entirely possible that Google could escalate things quickly. For example, use advertising to fully subsidise customer's mobile service plans and cut off the mobile operators revenue streams.

Worst case scenario of course...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…