Skip to main content

Blackberry's Keyboard Focus Plays To A Small Audience

Be honest, when was the last time you picked up your smartphone and wished it packed a physical keyboard? Whenever it was, it has slipped so far into distant memory that I can't remember it.
I was never a Blackberry user though. I always found it's platform as close to useless as Nokia's Symbian.
Now that Blackberry has accepted the reality that it cannot continue with its own mobile platform and made the switch to Android it has an opportunity to carve a niche for itself in the billion strong Android market.
It will only do that by changing the way it thinks.
For example the Priv and recently leaked Vienna both sport physical keyboards. Is that a selling point? Probably for the very small portion of smartphone buyers who answered my opening question 'every single day'.
What the keyboard really does is give most buyers a solid reason to not buy the Priv - a number of reviewers mention sticking to virtual keys after the intial flourish. That's not the kind of news that sits well with a device that is built around its keyboard.
Blackberry has to try and leverage its remaining brand loyalty and history and use it to position itself at the premium end of the Android market. It can only do that by building faultless hardware and software combinations.
The Priv is apparently far from that.
Blackberry has a security and privacy angle that could play well in the enterprise and premium buyers market, it needs to build a handset that doesn't deter those buyers. Which means getting rid of the keyboard and shipping a regular smartphone.
Yes it's valid for Blackberry to offer its shrinking band of loyal customers a hardware keyboard device, but it should only be doing that after it has established a market for itself. Because if it spends all its capital building keyboard handsets that nobody wants it won't generate enough to build the large screen slates that customers really do want.
And that really would be the end of the company.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…