Skip to main content

Apple Music On Android: Defies Logic, Makes Sense

Apple released a beta version of its Apple Music client for Android users today. Its a decision that flies in the face of logic. After all Android and Apple users are continually at each others throats and there has been a long proxy war between Google and Apple fought out against Android OEMs like Samsung and HTC.
However in the light of that battle, Apple's decision to support Android makes perfect sense, counter-intuitive as it seems.
Apple Music has two main competitors: Spotify and Google Play Music. Both are available cross-platform (Spotify's reach even extends to Windows Phone). Ordinarily this wouldn't be a concern for Apple, with close to a billion iOS users out there it could play in its own walled garden without worrying what's on the other side of the wall.
However, there is the small matter of family subscriptions to consider. These make much better sense than having individual users on different services.
Most families don't have a consistent preference for one device family however. And users also flip-flop between platforms. By being available only on its own platform Apple would be surrendering those users to Google, which offers a family subscription on both sides of the wall.
Whilst this is a big upside for Apple, it also accepts the risk of a similarly sized downside: Apple Music has been pretty awful on iOS. If the Android version proves to be as bad it could deter some users who might otherwise have switched on the basis that 'Apple just works'.
We know it doesn't, but advertising that fact to the users you're trying to convince it does could well backfire.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…