Skip to main content

The Tesla Model X Confuses Me

Tesla's Model X has been a long time coming - the company has been accepting orders for years now, but only started deliveries in the last few weeks. The car is eighteen months late getting to customers - ostensibly because the company wanted to focus on deliveries of its Model S. Or so it claimed.

However, when I look at the car I have to ask if the technology used actually caused the delays and I also have to question the reasons for those technologies.

For example, the Falcon doors. They look interesting and do achieve their stated aim of making it easier to access the second and third row of seats, but how are they superior to a sliding door? The truth is they aren't and from an engineering viewpoint they look very wrong. Cutting away such a large chunk of the roof rail can't help structural rigidity. Did they reject a proven solution purely to showboat?

Another question, why does the driver's door have to sense you and open automatically? If you walk past your door in your garage at home at you going to be swiped by an opening driver's door? What about if you approach from a different angle than normal - will it still sense your approach. What's wrong with a door handle, or if you really don't want customers to touch their cars, a button on the remote?

The push button to move the second row of seats forwards and backwards to provide rear seat access is a reasonable innovation. However given the likely low frequency of usage (for most buyers) is it really worth the expense, weight and complexity?

In short this isn't a car that has been designed to hit a low price point. Or to appeal to a wide demographic. It isn't likely to 'accelerate the world's transition to sustainable transport' and it isn't even sound engineering. By simplifying the design I don't doubt that Tesla could have got this car to market much earlier.

So why do it?
Was it just an Elon Musk vanity project? Or has all this intelligence been built in because Tesla is building towards an autonomous self-driving car? Is Tesla setting itself up to challenge Uber by building the taxi, the service and the driver?

If it were, then the Model X is the car that it would use to do it. Seven seats, lots of luggage space and even the ability to self fuel once Tesla rolls out its self-connecting charging rig.
It even explains the ridiculous doors, or it does if they plan on naming the service Johnny Cab.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…