Skip to main content

The Android Paradox

Android is by far the most popular mobile platform judged by both numbers of phones sold and numbers of phones in use.
However the news that only 20% of Android handsets are running variations of Android 5 Lollipop months after the announcement of Android 6 Marshmallow shows the inherent difficulties of treating Android as a single homogeneous platform.
Even if you just consider Google Play devices.
Any device not running the latest release of Android is vulnerable to all sorts of attacks. If you believe the reports coming from various sources those vulnerabilities are relatively simple to exploit and any sane user would be very concerned about access to the information stored on their phone.
Google isn't able to manage updates to the core Android platform at all well. Even tier one partners - the Samsungs, Sonys and LGs of this world, aren't able to get timely releases of updates pushed out to their users. By the time they have received a fix for an exploit from Google, tested it and the passed it through the carriers the weakness has changed or the fix been worked around or something new has been identified.
Even buying an unlocked device which isn't tethered to any carrier is no guarantee of a timely update.
As for those buying at the low and mid-range of the smartphone market the position is even worse. Low end Android phones almost never get updated. And with so many of those still running KitKat the security holes must be legion.
Android is awesome for its ability to be flexible, customizable and freely available to any OEM who wants to put it on a phone. Yet its patching and update weaknesses are surely going to be a source of serious trouble at some point down the line.
Google is very keen to publicise zero day exploits on other platforms, however until it has worked out a way of securing its own platform maybe it should wind its neck in. People in glass houses, and all that.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…