Skip to main content

Tesla Updated Its Cars With Self-Driving And Broke The Motor Industry

This week Tesla pushed out an update that added semi-autonomous driving features to some of its cars. Read that back to yourself and then consider how this compares to the traditional motor industry way of doing things. Tesla owners got new, enhanced and valuable features added to their cars at no cost and with no effort required.
That's an extinction level event for car manufacturers. The Tesla is the iPhone of cars. The rest of the industry is Palm or Nokia or even Motorola.
And if Tesla can being rocking the boat with what are actually tiny sales numbers, what on earth is going to happen when Apple arrives and starts throwing its weight around?
The traditional model of delivering car updates piecemeal, one tweak at a time every year throughout the vehicle's production cycle is unsustainable.
Of course not every feature is software upgradeable and nor is it feasible to deliver them at no cost. However over a typical three year ownership period car manufacturers are potentially missing out in significant income and customer loyalty by not providing upgrade paths.
Would the iPhone be as successful without regular iOS updates?
Car manufacturers offer tweaks to their models every year, offering them to existing customers promises both that income stream and better customer satisfaction. A tweak to the engine management system to make the car more fuel efficient or more powerful in line with the latest model, costs nothing but enhances the customer experience.
How about those other more tangible upgrades that suddenly make your 'new' car look a little less fancy - the new wheels, seats or entertainment system that always seem to be part of the new model year experience?
Offering them to customers with year old cars seems an entirely logical and simple step to take.
The winds of change are blowing for the motor industry and changing the way that they think about products, customers and service is imperative if they intend to survive.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…