Skip to main content

Scandal-hit VW May Not Sell Diesels In The US Next Year

Wired is reporting that Volkswagen has withdrawn its application for EPA certification for 2016 model year diesel-powered cars. That likely means that VW will only offer petrol-powered cars in the US for the foreseeable future.
Even though it's the result of the emissions test cheat it's probably a good result for America. In Europe the push to reduce carbon emissions meant that diesel oil was heavily subsidized, to the detriment of air quality as a result of much higher particulate and NOx emissions - even before VW's shady practice was uncovered. In the US diesel has never been anything like as popular and as a result air quality hasn't suffered to the same extent.
Car manufacturers are complaining about the new Euro 6 emissions standards, which seek to address this bad policy by cleaning up tailpipe emissions to a much higher standard. Those car makers are asking for the Euro 6 requirements to be phased in - allowing them to keep selling existing 'dirty' beyond the cutoff this month.
Europe's failure to properly manage the amount of soot exhausted by diesel engines has had an enormous effect on air quality and health. Visit any large European city and you'll know immediately. If the smog isn't a clue then the 'taste' in the air certainly will be. It's worrying that people living in these cities don't even notice how bad the air is.
One of the first things that I noticed when leaving the UK for New Zealand was the enormous improvement in air quality. Yes, part of that is down to the much lower population density. However a significant factor has to be the almost total absence of diesel powered vehicles.
More than just pushing for better tailpipe emissions from its new vehicle fleets, the EU needs to address air quality issues by pushing forward plans to electrify private transport, hand in hand with strategies to improve the quality and adoption of public transport.
Anything less would be just as scandalous as Volkswagen's decision to cheat the emissions test.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…