Skip to main content

Platform Lock-in No Longer An Issue Thanks To The Cloud

 
There's a certain elegance about the way in which cloud services have enabled mobile platform mobility.

This week I have been using my iPhone as my primary phone. The jump from using my Windows Phone was absolutely painless because all of my services sit in the cloud.

One of the reasons I use Microsoft's Groove music service is because it is available just about anywhere. A primary use case for my smartphone is for listening to music. Groove gives me access both to music within the service and any of my own tracks which I store in Onedrive.

A second use case which is important to me is reading. Again I use cloud based services to do this - Overdrive and Kindle. Both are widely available allowing me to switch from iOS to Android to Windows Phone and back again.

My preferred cloud provider is Microsoft. Again the ubiquity of Onedrive is key. Not only can I access my files from any platform, but also Onedrive handles the uploading of photos from whichever device I'm using. I take a lot of photos and knowing that I have a single location where they are reliably backed up gives me peace of mind.
 
For task management I use Wunderlist rather than a device specific app. Again the ability to use it anywhere is key, but its integration with IFTTT is another important factor. I can use various triggers to create a reminder, hugely useful when you're as naturally disorganized as I am.
 
Platform lock in has always been a big worry, but the way in which cloud services and application availability, have spread across platforms, means that with some careful tailoring of the tools you use jumping from Apple to Google to Microsoft and back again need never be a struggle.
 
That it is Microsoft that enables much of this is a vindication of Satya Nadella's 'Mobile first, cloud first' strategy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…