Skip to main content

HTC Has The One A9 Value Proposition All Wrong

Something has gone terribly wrong at HTC. Apparently the Taiwanese company has moved into another dimension where it feels comfortable charging ridiculous process for mid-range handsets.
As you'll know if you're a regular reader, I have a bit of a soft spot for HTC, I've owned numerous Windows Mobile, Windows Phone and Android handsets from the company. It has been responsible for some of the best hardware designs ever, as well as some of the cleverest innovations.
However the company has undergone something of a collapse in recent years. Mostly down to Samsung's ability to turn out more and more attractive and innovative handsets but also because of HTC's decision to try and focus on 'premium' as its USP.
Which brings us to the One A9. A handset that has courted controversy from the first leak. Altogether too much like an iPhone visually - despite HTC's protestations that Apple copied its designs - and now priced stratospherically, for a mid-range handset anyway.
Looking on the Carphone Warehouse website the A9 is currently more expensive that the infinitely superior Galaxy S6, Nexus 5X and LG G4. It's only £20 cheaper than a real iPhone 6.
There is no way that the A9 justifies that kind of price comparison. Yes it packs a fingerprint sensor and OIS, but in every other respect it lags every one of those devices.
So who's going to buy one? HTC fans? Probably not, the One M9 is only £90 more. Bargain hunters? Not when you an get three third gen Motorola Gs for the same price.
I can see a price drop in the very near future for the One A9, however that may not be enough to wipe away the bad taste the launch publicity has created.
If this is HTC's strategy for saving its business, I have to say the company looks even more doomed than ever.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…