Skip to main content

Getting Your Work Calendar Into The Cloud

One of the annoying things about doing work for large organisations is that they have policies and procedures which hamstring your way of working.
Case in point, I currently have an iPhone 6 which I required to use for all work communications. Okay, that doesn't sound like a bad thing. However email on the device doesn't use Exchange ActiveSync, which works everywhere and provides a good balance between security and usability.
Instead we have Good Technologies client. Which manages to be completely awful, adding a second password requirement to access email and doesn't integrate with the default PIM applications. It renders the whole thing useless.
Whilst I wouldn't recommend bypassing your oganisation's policies on email, it is possible and relatively safe (assuming your location isn't a trade or military secret) to synchronise your calendar directly to your device.
I'm not recommending you do this - in some organisations you may find that this is a sackable offence. However, that said if you understand the risks here's how to get it done.
All you need is a tool called Outlook Google Calendar Sync which you can download from here. Other than the fact that it successfully syncs your Outlook calendar with Google the key point about this tool is that it runs without needing to be installed, which enterprise users generally don't have the right to do.
Setup is trivial. Connect to your Google account (I'd suggest using a dedicated calendar within Google to separate work events from your other entries) and then choose which Outlook calendar and which event information you'd like synchronized. The frequency of synchronization can be controlled within the app, which can also be set to start on login.
Once you've finished setup and first sync go to your mobile device and add the new Google calendar to your default calendar application. 


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…