Skip to main content

Microsoft's New Strategy Is A Defense Against 'Good Enough'

 
Android tablets, the iPad, Chromebooks and the new iPad Pro represent a significant challenge to PC sales and Microsoft's embracing of these platforms represents a strategically sound defense against what could prove to be death by 'good enough'.

None of the devices I've listed above are particularly brilliant on their own, currently you need to pair them with a 'real' computer to cover the whole range of functions that form the current computing landscape.

For consumers this may not be the case for much longer. There comes a point where these cut down machines become good enough that we no longer worry about the missing functionality.

For old Microsoft this would prove to be an enormous problems. By focusing on delivering Microsoft services everywhere it becomes less so. The partnership with Cyanogen, the acquisition of Android and iOS apps, appearing on stage to talk up the capability of the iPad Pro, all of this demonstrates that Microsoft now has a desire to chase software subscriptions and deploy it services wherever it finds a willing recipient.

Currently the best way to experience Microsoft's services is on a Windows PC, that may not always be the case. By offering Office as a service Microsoft has a clear view of how its subscribers access the service and where it will gain the most return from development dollars. If that proves to be iOS or Android then Windows users may find that they drop back in the line for updates.

Good enough might just prove to be the thing that kills the PC, rather than any specific replacement product. Microsoft has positioned itself to flourish whichever way that goes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…