Skip to main content

LA iPad In Schools Fallout Continues, Lenovo, Apple And Pearson To Pay Millions

Pearson, Apple, Lenovo and the LAUSD are under investigation by the FBI as the repercussions of its horribly bungled iPad for schools program reverberate around the district. It appears that there is some question over the legitimacy of the tendering process, and with a contract worth $1.3bn that's something that needs careful scrutiny.
The School District is facing allegations of corruption and mismanagement, which if proven, will inevitably lead to criminal prosecutions.
At the moment there's no suggestion that Apple or Lenovo were involved in any wrongdoing. However both companies will be making some form of retribution to the School District. Lenovo in the form of $2.2m worth of laptops, Apple paying $4.5m in cash.
Pearson will also be making a payment - around $6.5m. However, as the lead contractor with responsibility for delivering the software which made the project viable (questionably), Pearson's liability may not end there. The absence of course curriculum and learning material ensured the project could never have succeeded in its targets.
There is no question that giving primary school kids access to technology is beneficial, however the technology isn't the be all and end all of the process. Clearly defined learning outcomes, integration into the learning environment and a learning pathway are key. The technology should be a means and not an end.
Amongst all the acrimony and recriminations it would be well to remember that there are 640,000 LA kids whose learning has been damaged by the actions of a few misinformed and / or criminally driven individuals. The companies involved were too busy celebrating the financial and marketing benefits of the deal to remember this.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…