Skip to main content

Driven: Mercedes A180, Decidedly Average At A Premium

 
When Mercedes introduced the first A-class back in 1997 it delivered one of the most technically innovative and ground-breaking designs on decades. The upright body shape and sandwich floor design created a roomy compartment with exceptional safety features.
 
When it replaced the A-class in 2012 Mercedes stepped back from its innovative (and controversial) design to release the W176 A-class, a standard family hatchback that lacks any of the features that made its predecessor unique.
 
In designing something conformist Mercedes is clearly seeking to see a better return on its investment than the original, which managed two million sales in its fifteen year lifespan.
 
Externally the A180 is drab - and that's not just down to the gunmetal colour of the car I drove. It's a design which lacks any kind of flair, doesn't draw the eye in nor reward visual appraisal. In a class filled with interesting designs and topped by the eye-poppingly gorgeous Alfa Romeo Giulietta, the A-class is a poor effort.
 
Inside things aren't much better. A dark, claustrophobic interior is lifted by reasonable quality materials, but the total failure to integrate the entertainment system's display unit dominates the internal visuals. To say it's laughably bad would be understating the case. It looks like something a teenager might have bolted onto their Max-Power'ed Citroen Saxo.
 
The equipment levels aren't bad though, given the price of this entry level model you shouldn't be expecting anything less. The seats are comfortable - much more so than looks suggest - and a comfortable driving position is easily found.
 
Once you start driving any illusion of this being a premium vehicle falls apart. The engine is as sonorous as a shaken bag of nails, wheezing and whining through its rev range without ever demonstrating a power band or a sweet spot. Throttle response is slow enough to be measurable and the gearbox stumbles through each gear change. At least it rides reasonably well.
 
In short this is the sort of car designed to remove any of the joy of driving from the driving experience. Avoid at all costs.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.