Skip to main content

Apple May Have Chosen The Wrong OS For Its Big iPad


Now that the dust has settled down and we've got over the fact that Apple was undertaking a brief stint as the world's biggest Microsoft cover band, there's an opportunity to review what Apple did with the new iPad Pro.

First of all it validated the efforts of Microsoft and Samsung in bringing the stylus back into the mainstream. Apple may call its stylus a pencil, but it's a stylus all the same. Albeit a clever one.

The keyboard cover showed that Apple's design bods don't always get things right. It's ugly and clumsy when compared to the Surfaces Type Cover. The quick availability of third party keyboard covers suggests Apple was aware that it had issues with its design.

All those comments not withstanding, viewed as a whole the iPad Pro stands up as a product. It will take sales from the top of the tablet market and from the bottom end of the Macbook market. It fits a niche for Apple owners who want more than an iPad but already have a laptop.

In that respect, I don't believe that it will compete with the Surface Pro 3, which is a device that stands on its own, as the only computing device you'll need.

Maybe this represents a mistake by Apple. If the iPad Pro had been the MacBook Tablet and been powered by OS X it could have been both more expensive/profitable and infinitely more desirable. For all Apple's promises of performance gains with its new hardware a powerful iPad remains an iPad at heart. It could have been much more than that.

No desktop class applications means the professionals who Apple were targeting will be less likely to bite. The arrival of those desktop class applications on the iPad isn't guaranteed either. The App Store has pushed software prices to the floor and with no guarantee of large sales numbers the cost of re-writing those apps for the Pro may never be recouped.

Therefore I believe that iPad Pro sales will come from two specific markets. Those who just want a bigger iPad and those prosumer artists and designers who see the stylus and big screen as a better canvas.

There's no question that the iPad Pro will sell well. And ultimately that's all that Apple cares about. But will it bring Apple customers who are currently outside of its ecosystem?

Of that I'm less convinced.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.