Skip to main content

Statcounter Shows Steady Windows 10 Growth


Microsoft announced that it had seen 14 million Windows 10 upgrades within the first twenty-four hours of the new OS becoming available and hasn't said much more since. Estimates from various sources have more recent shipping numbers at 25, 27 and 67 million. Without word from Redmond we can't know how successful the new OS is proving.
Statcounter might help to make a guess at that number though.
After twenty four hours on sale Windows 10 hadn't been installed on enough PCs to move the graph, instead it was lumped in with the 'other' category. The lowest score by a separately ranked OS was 1.92%, for Windows Vista. So Windows 10 was below 1.9% of the active PC market at that point.
Fast forward to the most recently released figures and Windows 10 is sitting at 4.84% of the active market. A growth of a minimum of 260%. Taking that 14m day one figure from Microsoft we can guess that a minimum of 36.5m PCs are now running the latest OS.
That 4.84% of active market compares well with OS X, for which the number is 7.6%. So Microsoft's new OS is two-thirds of the way to blasting past all versions of OS X in just ten days of availability...
It's clear that Microsoft has managed to deliver an OS that has caught the public interest, and not just the traditional tech group either. My non-technical friends and colleagues are amongst those who complain most vociferously that they haven't received their upgrade yet, and are the most excited once the new OS has been installed.
Its a turnaround of public opinion even more pronounced that the post-Vista lovefest that was Windows 7. It will be interesting to see whether PC vendors are able to leverage that interest into a reversal of the recent PC sales decline.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…