Skip to main content

Silent September Is A Monumentally Stupid Idea

Talk of the way that streaming services divvy out subscription revenue has been under scrutiny for a while. It is a model which introduces some challenges and identifies some unfairness in the agreements between artists and labels.
Nonetheless, the model is sound and ensures that those artists who get the most listening time get paid the biggest share of the pot. Artists and scammers trying to game the services by artificially bumping up the number of plays they receive - and by association their share of the pot - have meant that services are forced to implement tests to ensure that play counts are legitimate.
Now a group are calling for listeners to get involved in a protest called 'Silent September' whereby listeners leave their music players on a constant repeat cycle with the volume turned off. The logic being that by selecting an independent artist and repeatedly playing their music you help to bump up their share of the pay-out.
And this is a protest against gaming of the system?
Aside from the obvious objection that this is deliberately depriving other artists of their legitimate share of the pot, there's no clear articulation of how this will bring about a change which the sponsors of the protest seek. To whit, if many users do this the overall number of streams increase, the per stream remuneration drops and whilst the indie artists who are selected by Silent September listeners benefit by a small amount the bigger artists, who number their plays in the tens or hundreds of millions, won't even notice the drop in their share of the pot.
How does that incentivise change?
Certainly the aim of the service, to replace payment based on percentage of overall streams with one based on a share of each individual's total streams - paid from that individual subscription - is laudable, although much more complex to calculate. However whether it would actually materially affect the amount of cash paid out to individual artists is another matter and as yet untested either way.
Silent September won't effect a change and will hurt artists by reducing their payout. Taking part really doesn't help anyone.
In the meantime artists need to look at streaming income as part of an holistic model for payments, with live performance, radio play and licensing all adding to their income.
"Andersricky1" by andersricky - Licensed under Attribution via Wikimedia Commons


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…