Skip to main content

Samsung Denies Europe Galaxy Note 5, Bets On Edge+

Samsung's launch of the Galaxy Note 5 and Edge+ went pretty much as predicted, with most of the leaks turning out to be pretty accurate. No Micro-SD card slot and no removable battery were the major casualties of the move to Samsung's new premium strategy.
I'm not sure how the Note's power userbase will take to those changes. Nor the clip-on keyboard accessory which seems completely redundant in these days of continuous flow typing and - on the Note at least - pen driven handwriting recognition.
For Europeans they won't have to worry about adjusting to these changes though, as Samsung has said that the whole continent will be denied the Note 5 for marketing reasons.
Presumably that's a sign that the Note 4 did poorly there. Probably because it was priced head to head with the iPhone 6+ and buyers were prepared to forego the S-pen and its capabilities in favour of Apple's promise of updates and quality (which is a completely different thing to premium by the way).
The need for Samsung to reverse its ongoing poor financial performance and the indication that buyers preferred the S6 Edge to the flat S6 has probably been a driver behind this decision. If the expectation was that the Note wasn't going to make the headway in the market Samsung needed of it, then culling the product probably isn't a bad idea.
The pricing of the edge+ is going to be critical then. If, as seems likely, it is more expensive than the equivalent iPhone 6+ it is going to struggle in the same way its smaller siblings have done. Priced competitively it may prevent erosion of Samsung's market share and bottom line.
Can it reverse Samsung's downward trend? I'd be surprised, and even if it does it would only be a temporary salvation. Much as Samsung has built a loyal following, the market still doesn't have huge demand for premium Android phones - especially when they're priced head to head with Apple's iPhones.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…