Skip to main content

Repair v Replace: How The PC Industry Is Falling Out

 
In days gone by the motor industry talked about cars of the future being sealed for life - a vehicle that you drove out of the showroom and then didn't have to return to the workshop until the car had reached the end of its useful life.
 
It never happened, of course. The motor industry realised the most profitable part of being in the motor industry was the servicing and maintenance regime. Keep them coming back and spending. By stretching warranties and bumping up labour rates, as well as the hefty markup on service items, the motor industry, as a whole, has managed to survive and in some cases flourish, in challenging times.
 
The PC industry is seeing a similar challenge. In days gone by enterprise replacement schedules meant that PC manufacturers were benefiting from reselling new equipment every three years. The consumer market followed suit.
 
Two things happened to change that. Firstly Windows XP arrived and cleaned up the operating system's act. No longer would the very act of using your PC cause it to get slower and slower.
 
At the same time the demand for processing power from applications levelled off. Sure, games and certain niche applications still demand all the power you can provide, but for most users email, web browsing and Office applications are about as strenuous as it gets.
 
So now the PC industry has some rethinking to do. Some manufacturers have embraced the abandoned future of the motor industry, with sealed for life designs, motivated by a desire to fix the life of the machine to that of the first major component failure. Others have been more flexible about the ability to upgrade machines - adding memory and replacing storage or batteries are trivial for these machines.
 
When the time comes to upgrade your machine the long term viability should really factor into your thinking. There's no reason why a new machine shouldn't provide a minimum of five years service as far as performance goes. You should be considering how component failures and the complexity of repair will impact that capability when making your buying decision.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…

WhartonBrooks Indiegogo Windows 10 Mobile Even More Doomed To Failure Than Usual

WhartonBrooks is currently crowd-funding its latest Windows Mobile smartphone on Indiegogo. If crowdfunding isn't already a bad enough idea, a company trying to crowdfund a Windows Mobile device should be warning enough for you.
Not that anyone seems to be taking the project too seriously. With a few weeks left to run the campaign has managed to ensnare just 2% of its $1.1m target.
If you want a better indication of how few Window Mobile loyalists remain I doubt there is one. Of 3,900 Windows Phone enthusiasts Wharton Brooks was seeking for its new phone, it has managed to entice just 50.
Windows for Phones is dead, even if the corpse hasn't stopped twitching yet.