Skip to main content

Nowhere Left For Samsung To Hide

The iPhone 6 was possibly the worst thing that could have happened to Samsung. It took the Galaxy S range's unique selling point and matched it. Then, in a passable attempt at an own goal, Samsung the other two big advantages of its flagship out from the S6 - removable batteries and expansion card slots.
Now I can understand why some people argue that a removable battery is not a requirement and I'm sure that Samsung themselves were aware of how many battery charging kits it sold. The truth is that removing that capability from the S6 meant it was less of a phone than the Galaxy S5. Perhaps my favourite thing about the S5 was that I never plugged it in at any time. The spare battery was always charged up and ready to be dropped into the phone at a moments notice.
Its also true that this isn't the way that most people think of the replaceable battery. Users are considering the ease of replacement when the battery loses its ability to hold a charge. If you've bought a phone on a two year contract its entirely possible that you'll be suffering from this halfway through your contract. Buying a cheap replacement battery is an easy salve for this problem.
I've yet to heard a valid argument against the memory expansion slot though.
Having now replicated the change across its whole flagship range (S6, S6 Edge, Edge+, Note 5) Samsung has nowhere left to hide. If its new device range can't reverse its recent poor performance (and I see no reasons why it should) and Apple continues to take bites out of its rivals market share, it may be time for Samsung to accept the reality that it doesn't understand its customers or the premium market quite as well as it thinks.
For me if I was looking to buy a high end Samsung phone right now I'd look no further than the Galaxy S5 / Note 4, depending on how big you want it. If many more people feel the same then Samsung's next set of results could end up being a bit of a bloodbath.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…