Skip to main content

Does Mozilla Have A Case In Windows 10 Browser Complaint?

Users upgrading to Windows 10 are finding that post upgrade their default applications for certain processes have been changed to Windows built-in apps. Notably the Edge web browser.
Now there is a case to answer that Edge isn't quite mature enough to force upon the whole Windows 10 world - there are some missing bits of functionality that require using the supplied version of Internet Explorer.
Mozilla, through its CEO Chris Beard, has been vociferous about the decision to set Edge as the default browser in Windows because it ignores a user's expressed choice. The move is being compared to the previous anticompetitive behaviour that earned Microsoft serious sanction, back in the day.
Well, yes, no and maybe.
The world is a different place right now. Microsoft isn't battling Mozilla for the best browser, it's battling Apple and Google for a the overall desktop user experience.
In terms of sales iOS is neck and neck with the PC. Yet Apple allows no discussion about changing the default browser on iPads or iPhones. Likewise I imagine you'd get some very funny looks if you tried to have a discussion with Google about changing the browser on your Chromebook - given that the whole OS is the browser. At least with Windows you have the option to revert Microsoft's decision once you've tried Edge and judged it.
It seems that too many third-parties are happy to accept the nasty-end of the stick when it comes to Apple (in particular) yet rush to lambast Microsoft for things that are far less restrictive.
Rather than berating Microsoft for switching my browser on upgrade, an action which was expected and is easily reversed, how about having a discussion about why I can't set Firefox (or Chrome) as the default browser on my iPhone or iPad? Because that's far more frustrating for me and many other users.


Popular posts from this blog

F1: Robert Kubica Impresses In Renault Test Run

The car may be old but its the performance of the driver that's the story here. Robert Kubica returned to F1, after a fashion, earlier this week with an extensive test run in a 2012 Lotus Renault F1 car at Valencia.
The age of the car and the circuit were likely determined by F1's current rules which ban testing, but the reason for Kubica being in the car is far more interesting. Considered by many to be a potential World Champion and certainly one of the fastest drivers of his generation, Kubica's F1 career seemed to be over after a 2011 crash whilst driving in the Rally of Andora. His Skoda Fabia was penetrated by a guardrail in the high speed accident partially severing his right arm.
Up until last year Kubica has been competing in rallying, with the expectation that the limited movement in his repaired arm would prohibit a return to single seater racing.
So this week's test is both interesting and confusing. Interesting because Kubica completed 115 laps of the ret…

F1: Robert Kubica's Williams Test Asks More Questions Than It Answers

Comparing driver's times at a tyre evaluation test like last week's Abu Dhabi event is difficult at the best of times, but when trying to assess the performance of a driver who has been out of the sport for six years, that difficulty level is raised even higher.
On the face of it Robert Kubica's test for Williams was a success. Fastest of the three Williams drivers present the headlines look promising. However, taking into consideration the different tyres used to set those times muddies the water considerably.
Kubica ran a three lap qualifying simulation on the new 'hyper-soft' tyre - which should have given him a two-second advantage. Correcting for tyres it would appear that Kubica was significantly slower than Sergei Sorotkin - who was on the harder 'soft' tyre - and marginally quicker than Lance Stroll, the team's only contracted driver.

Stroll's family fortune currently funds Williams, so there' no chance that he will be anywhere but in a…

Panos Panay's Defence Of Microsoft Surface Hardware Sounds Eerily Familiar

This weekend I went out with my ten year old daughter to select a laptop for her school year beginning in January. The schools requirements are quite specific, requiring a Windows 10 device, with a preference for a touchscreen and a stylus. She chose a Surface Pro, after trying a large number of different options. Having seen the way I use my own Surface Pro - and tried it herself there was only ever going to be two options - and the other was a Surface Laptop.
I tell you this so that you understand I am a buyer of Microsoft's products through choice, not compulsion. I'm on my third Surface device now. 
So when Panos Panay dismissed reports of the death of the Surface hardware line, I was very interested to see exactly how strong these denials were. Especially how they reflect what has gone before. To whit: Windows 10 Mobile.
Panay claimed that Microsoft is in hardware for the long haul. Almost exactly mirroring the words of Terry Myerson, when he claimed Windows Mobile was g…